RESUMEN
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) attempts to restore native ACL function. Persistent anterolateral instability is a common symptom after ACLR that can lead to worse patient outcomes. Additional surgeries, like anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), can augment the ACL graft and help increase anterolateral rotational stability. Certain indications for ACLR with ALLR include high-grade pivot shift, increased posterior tibial slope (>12°), revision ACLR, and concomitant ligamentous or meniscal injuries. We describe an anatomic ALLR technique using an 8 cm long × 1 cm wide strip of the inferior aspect of the iliotibial band fixed at the native attachment sites of the ALL.
RESUMEN
Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be a challenging and complex process for the athlete, with the rate of return to the pre-injury level of sport observed to be less than athlete expectations. Of the athletes that do return to sport (RTS), knee re-injury rates remain high, and multiple studies have observed impaired athletic performance upon RTS after ACLR as well as reduced playing time, productivity, and career lengths. To mitigate re-injury and improve RTS outcomes, multiple RTS after ACLR consensus statements/clinical practice guidelines have recommended objective RTS testing criteria to be met prior to medical clearance for unrestricted sports participation. While the achievement of RTS testing criteria can improve RTS rates after ACLR, current criteria do not appear valid for predicting safe RTS. Therefore, there is a need to review the various factors related to the successful return to the pre-injury level of sport after ACLR, clarify the utility of objective performance testing and RTS criteria, further discuss safe RTS decision-making as well as present strategies to reduce the risk of ACL injury/re-injury upon RTS. This article provides a practical review of the current RTS after ACLR literature, as well as makes medical recommendations for rehabilitation and RTS decision-making after ACLR.
RESUMEN
Background and Objective: Knee surgery attempts to restore the native biomechanics of the knee, improve stability, and decrease the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). However, despite improvements in surgical techniques, tissue degradation and OA are common after knee surgery, occurring in higher rates in surgical knees compared to non-surgical knees. The aim of this study is to analyze previous literature to determine which synovial fluid biomarkers contribute to knee tissue degradation and decrease patient outcomes in the post-surgical setting of the knee. Methods: A narrative review of relevant literature was performed in July 2023. Studies reporting on synovial biomarkers associated with the post-surgical knee were included. Key Content and Findings: The literature reported that proinflammatory synovial biomarkers cause cartilage degradation and turnover which eventually leads to OA. The associated biomarkers are typically present prior to physical symptoms so understanding which one's correlate to OA is important for potential therapeutic treatments in the future. Studying the preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative synovial biomarkers will allow physicians to develop an improved understanding of how these biomarkers progress and correlate to knee tissue degradation and OA. This understanding could lead to further developments into potential treatment options. Research into inhibiting or reversing these inflammatory biomarkers to slow the progression of knee tissue degradation has already begun and has reported some promising results but is currently limited in scope. Conclusions: Synovial fluid biomarkers in the post-surgical knee setting may contribute to decreased patient outcomes and the progression of knee tissue degradation. There is no current consensus on which of these biomarkers are the most detrimental or associated with decreased patient outcomes. With an improved understanding of the individual biomarkers, potential personalized therapeutic treatment could be used by physicians in the future to improve patient outcomes after surgery.
RESUMEN
Background: Medial meniscus ramp tears are present in 22.9-40.8% of anterior cruciate ligament tears. The diagnosis of ramp tears is difficult on MRI, with sensitivity reported around 48%, which has recently emphasized the importance of proper arthroscopic probing for ramp tears. Methods: A prospective evaluation was performed on patients undergoing a single bundle ACL reconstruction to assess patient demographics, posterior tibial slope, posterior cruciate ligament angle, Lachman's exam, and rotational instability to determine secondary findings associated with medial meniscal ramp tears. Results: A total of 96 patients underwent ACL reconstruction, of these, 63 patients had an isolated ACL tear, and 33 patients had an ACL tear with a concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear. A high-grade Lachman's exam and male sex were associated with medial meniscus ramp tears. There were no differences in posterior tibial slope, posterior cruciate ligament angle, or rotational instability between groups. Conclusions: This study found that a high-grade Lachman's exam and male sex were significantly associated with patients with an ACL tear with a concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear. These findings suggest that an ACL tear with concomitant medial meniscus ramp tear may be better diagnosed based upon the clinical evaluation rather than other secondary radiological findings.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The primary objective was to systematically review the literature evaluating patient-reported outcomes and return to sport after re-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedures. The secondary objectives were 2-fold: to identify the risk factors that lead to revision ACLR failure and to assess the secondary knee structure injuries after the initial revision ACLR. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were outcomes of re-revision ACLR, minimum of 2 years' follow-up, human studies, and English language. Basic science articles, epidemiologic studies, editorials, surgical technique articles, surveys, cadaveric studies, and animal studies were excluded. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were considered for review. There were 6 Level III and 9 Level IV studies that included 399 patients undergoing re-revision ACLR. The rate of concomitant meniscal lesions at the time of re-revision ranged from 35% to 90%. The prevalence of concomitant cartilaginous lesions at the time of re-revision ranged from 13.6% to 90%. Compared with preoperative scores, patient-reported outcomes overall improved after re-revision ACLR, with mean preoperative Lysholm scores ranging from 38.4 to 73.15 that improved to postoperative scores ranging from 68 to 87.8. However, return to sport at preinjury levels was inconsistent, with rates ranging from 12.5% to 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Re-revision ACLR was found to restore knee stability and improve functional outcomes. Despite this improvement, there was a low rate of return to sport at the preinjury level. Functional outcomes were also inferior when compared with primary ACLR. In addition, concomitant knee pathologies were found to rise in prevalence compared with revision and primary ACLR cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
